Sounds bizarre? Obviously, it is. How could I say against a democratic ritual! But experiencing so much pain due to the political catastrophe in many countries including mine, I am depressed and tired.
- · I feel bad when any political leader is being murdered. (Probably you could not identify, how many in the past to date?)
- · I feel bad when un-trust evolves between political parties. (Election under Interim government or running government -is a big question)
- · I feel bad when political parties in a horrible clash. (Remember 2014 fire-election!)
- · I feel bad when a defeated opponent party behaves unruly against the elected and vice versa!
- · I feel bad when general people are also a Victim* in political war. ( Many newspapers are pointing to sabotage regarding the recent Banani fire tragedy as well you might remember that they were also the fire-victim in 2014.)
- · I feel bad when women are politically raped. (Subornochar lost its nice color!)
- · I feel bad when an election is manipulated. (You observed the recent national and local elections as well past manipulated elections by major parties!)
- · I feel bad, when politics ignite the religious hatred, ignite the unlawful act on minorities. (You know that! Silent migration of minorities is not silent!)
- · I feel bad, when….
(Note: Feel bad scenario is for Bangladesh but other countries also have likely gray shades regarding politics and elections!)
 |
| vice-versa |
 |
| Politics or Poly-Sticks believes in Gender-Equality! |
I should not cut my head having a headache!
Right, you are but I like to attract your thoughts to our other rituals.
-How schools or any academic institution is running? How they are
 |
| "Victim-Innocent General People" of Political Fire |
An election is a system also which we developed through a lot of struggle against our past ruling systems like Feudal, Fascist or King’s ruling. But do you believe that this system could elect the right skilled person? Hopefully not.
Didn't you experience the muscle and money is a driving force which often elect a corrupt or merely educated person and that eventually affect the future problematic events for a country and raise our political-pain?
Didn't you observe votes are already bought or cast? Your voting power is already hacked!
Further, how much do you know about a candidate before a short period for election?
Often it is seen that corrupted people are on the show and trying to buying the votes to get the power and eventually this power is used later to increase his assets! Did you judge that this man has such knowledge to run a crucial administrative post? Are money, muscle and so-called popularity ( could be fake and often induced by his benefited supporters!) is the gimmick to own a responsible political post? Does not it seems that politics is a toy of a toddler?!
Actually, an election is a mega process, that’s why it has so many pitfalls. The major pitfalls of politics and election systems are-
- Everything collapsed when any major political crisis raises in any country. School, college, universities, office, shops, hospitals...everything suffered due to this system. But you know, a very little percentage of the population is active in politics whereas the majority suffered from the volatile clash between political parties!
- This system causes numerous kinds of corruptions like the unfair practice of Power and Law, Economic corruption (it is your money through taxes and vats, that often picked-pocket and it’s Your Money* again that makes this whole political system running!), Party biases of administrations, Illegal land acquisition (those who have power, will make your land for themselves!)...etc.
- Due to various types of corruption, every general people or citizen cannot own what they could own.
But what about, we could make the election system as like as an academic system?!
To run a state, a great amount of knowledge in every field is required in today’s first world and that’s why political science has been evolved. What about our future leaders should study political science with variable syllabus having primary and secondary major subjects in focus and variable levels of examinations?
You might ask then, this system could not adopt the great philosophical ideologies or values like democracy, socialism, nationalism or even politics based on religion or still any un-invented idealism! The answer is variable syllabus of political science having a focus on the major subjects (like political science with Democracy, Socialism, etc., as prime major along with Finance or Medical or Engineering as a secondary major, etc.,) and having various level of examinations like Secondary, Higher secondary, Bachelor, Doctorate, etc., across the country.
It is obvious that Secondary and Higher secondary should only focus the political science in such a degree that is applicable for these stages and should be exempted from any other majors as said above. More thoughts and research must be needed in devising the various levels of syllabus of political science.
Doctorates and bachelors and aged and experienced scholars will form the topmost administrative posts like President, Prime Minister and other Ministers while young scholars as MP s, etc,. those needed very knowledge and skill to run while school and college candidates will fill up the applicable lower administrations.
But all of them need to pass a “Special Examination” (we might call it as "Leaders Examination" or "LEX") having various levels to become a country leader for various administrative strata in 5 years interval and top graded and majority of any idealism will decide the ideology that will govern the country for the next 5 years and the second major subject will decide the field of any country leader i.e., health minister should not be of general discipline but must have a second major of medical study along with political science having any prime major like democracy or socialism, etc. Any candidate might get at least three chances to attend this examination but an age restriction could be suggested according to life expectancy and other countable criteria of a country. Self-educated people also could attend if they want to.
You might ask now, but what about the popularity of any student cum future leader? But remember popularity only should not be a determining factor to vote any leader rather knowledge in the respective field or for the post, behavior and past histories of corruption and crime should override popularity.
Yes, that will be graded too but not through voting or election (you see the DACSU-2019 election)!
Popularity should be measured and graded through various tests or reports of all class teachers like the reports regarding behavior, general knowledge, social and common activities in academies as well reports from the neighborhoods or dormitories collected from various sources like from senior citizens, clubs, local communities even from the police! So our future leader will face a lot of popularity and behavioral screening! These grades will affect administrative designations.
Further, to control all these steps, we need to develop or invent quantum or blockchain or AI based machines and mechanism, which will protect any type of corruption in educational as well in every field. This is very necessary because after passing that "Special Examination" there is no certainty that these leaders could not be bought by money or will not do any political harm with the help of their supporters! As well, these machines and mechanism should be used for time to time in the various survey and to get the opinions of the people or leading group of people or organizations, institutions about any controversial issues across the country
I think you are now inspired to use these machines in our so-called present election system to keep it as it is!
Yes, we can but you will not get the aged experienced or young and popular scholar who could serve today’s complex State functions more efficiently. Further, every idealism or man of every ideology might get the chance to run the country simultaneously after passing that special examination. It will be a mix but not such that, all Ministers/MP s are from only one idealism or party and which often led to one party Authoritarianism or Autocracy. Thus a mix of various ideologies and scholars in parliament will be more effective for society.
One idealism is possible only when the majority of leaders of any particular idealism like democracy or socialism will pass that special examination! This will define if the country should be ruled with Democratic, Socialist or with Religious vision or with a Common vision of doing good for the next five years! But actually, this will merely happen. Even to sustain a mix-up and to prevent one-party rule, a balanced system could be proposed as well a common ideology that will be beneficiary for all citizens should be adopted. In this regard, a limit factor might help. For example, if though, leaders of any particular idealism could pass the "LEX" with majority, a set maximum numbers for any idealism will determine how much of them could join the Parliament while leaders of other idealism should join according to their results while a set minimum nos for every idealism or common quota will determine their least nos to join. But the minimum is applicable if and only if they attend the "LEX".
Actually, political problems arise due to the lack of balance or absence of opponent parties or small nos of them in the parliament often causes the one party Authoritarianism as well the conspiracy of opponents leads to the political clash. So always a balanced parliament is good and actually debate, discussion or controversy in Parliament is better than the debates on roads.
But here is a crucial question about the numbers of political parties because everybody could start a political party to gain access in Parliament due to the set minimum factor or minimum common quota. Yes, it could happen! So how we could manage this situation? Here simply we need to limit the nos of political parties in a country and in my opinion, only two nos should be healthy. Actually, if our prime motto is to develop our nation, there is no need to override it with so many ideologies instead a common goal for doing good or to improve every citizen's lifestyle is more necessity while considering the history, culture, etc., values of the country.
Nowadays it is proved that every idealism has some drawbacks, such as Democracy turns to capitalism and exploitation of man by man or man being modern slaves of capitalists, Socialism turns to ill-economy and mismanagement, Nationalism could lead a country to a supremacist and alone, etc. Knowing those drawbacks and only having the above common goal, scholar leaders of this system should always try to lead this system in such a way to avoid those pitfalls with their knowledge and education. So only two political parties playing the role of the opponent and the ruling party will debate about the various ways to develop the country.
Thus I think, those who intended to lead the country and are capable to pass the examinations could form the Government. As well as being a continuous process, this system will be free of election hazards as well a great deal of State-money could be saved. while followers or supporter issues could be controlled in a healthy manner because THERE IS NO SUCH MONEY OR MUSCLE GAME TO BUY YOUR SUPPORTERS BUT IT IS YOUR BRAIN AND BEHAVIOR ONLY, WHICH COULD MAKE YOU A POPULAR SCHOLAR LEADER! STILL, IF ANY MAL-PRACTICE OF FOLLOWER ISSUE ARISES, JUDICIARY, EXECUTIVE OR LEGISLATURE WILL RULED OUT.
IN THIS REGARD I ALSO LIKE TO SUGGEST FOR A TRUE SEPARATION OF POWERS. THAT MEANS, THE THREE ORGANS OF THE STATE I.E,. LEGISLATURE, JUDICIARY, AND EXECUTIVE SHOULD BE INDEPENDENT IN TRUE SENSE. NO ORGAN COULD DICTATE OR EMPLOY OTHERS BUT IN TODAY'S WORLD, WE SEE THAT, LEGISLATURE GOVERNMENT HAS CONTROL ON TWO OTHERS BY VARIOUS MEANS SUCH AS EMPLOYMENT OF JUDICIARY AND EXECUTIVE PEOPLE WHICH EVENTUALLY AND OFTEN BECOMES THE TOOL FOR LEGISLATURE TO CONTROL MAL-PRACTICES OF THEIR POWER. AND ALREADY WE KNOW OR ESTABLISH OUR SYSTEMS THAT, PEOPLE OF JUDICIARY AND EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT COMES FROM OUR ACADEMIC SYSTEMS, SO WHY NOT THE LEGISLATURE? I ALSO SUGGEST FOR SUCH A PARLIAMENT, WHERE PEOPLES OR MEMBERS OF ALL THREE ORGANS SHOULD BE INCORPORATED WHILE ANY CROSS MEMBERSHIP SHOULD BE DISCOURAGED I.E, MEMBERS OF THE LEGISLATURE SHOULD NOT BE THE MEMBERS OF EXECUTIVE OR JUDICIARY BUT THEY WILL HELP OR SUPPLY INFORMATION IN BUILDING THE "CONSTITUTION". AS WELL SOME SUPPORTIVE SECTORS IN PARLIAMENT COULD EASE THE WHOLE PROCESS LIKE REPRESENTATIVES OF JOURNALISTS, HUMANITARIAN, ENVIRONMENTAL, RELIGIOUS, SCIENTIFIC ORGANIZATIONS. IN THIS WAY A MORE CAUTION WILL BE NEEDED IN WRITING (BY THE LEGISLATURE) OR INTERPRETING (BY THE JUDICIARY)THE "CONSTITUTION". WE MIGHT FEEL INSECURE ABOUT THE TRUE INDEPENDENCE FOR THE JUDICIARY AND ESPECIALLY FOR THE EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT BECAUSE IT MIGHT COUP THE POWER. YES, IT COULD HAPPEN FOR GREEDY EXECUTIVE LOYAL BUT IT IS PROVED, IT CANNOT SUSTAIN SO LONG BECAUSE OF THE INTERNAL AND EXTERNAL PRESSURE OR THEY CONVERTED THEM IN THE MAINSTREAM. THOUGH FROM THE PAST HISTORY, YOU KNOW THAT, COUP ONLY HAPPENS WHEN STATE POWER IS FAILED TO RUN OR IN CORRUPTION. AGAIN, IS NOT IT MORE INSECURE WHEN A TIE BETWEEN LEGISLATURE AND EXECUTIVE HAPPENS? ANYWAY, I THINK, WHEN THESE THREE ORGANS SHOULD BE DICTATED OR SHOULD BE LIABLE ONLY TO THE SOVEREIGN STATE PRINCIPLES OR " CONSTITUTION", A BALANCED POLITICAL SYSTEM COULD EVOLVE AND MAL-PRACTICES OF POWER MIGHT BE MINIMIZED.
FINALLY, AS CITED BEFORE, IT IS YOUR AND ALL CITIZEN'S MONEY AND WORK THAT RUN THIS BIG POLITICAL SYSTEM...SO WHY NOT WE SHOULD MAKE IT MORE BETTER? ACTUALLY, WE THE PEOPLE, THE PRIME FORCE OF ANY STATE, SHOULD REBUILD OR CHANGE OUR RULING SYSTEM TIME TO TIME IN THE PAST FOR THE COMMON GOOD, SO WHY NOT AGAIN IN FUTURE TO HAVE A STATE THAT WILL TRULY SERVE THE IDIOM?-
"OF THE PEOPLE, BY THE PEOPLE, FOR THE PEOPLE"
But the question is how could you change a ruling system when it often took the shape of civil war and riots? Indeed it's a risky job. Still, our past history shows that, whatever the cost is, people denied any system when it is failed to meet their expectations. But here I like to put an idea that could help but might not ensure the bloodless revolution as corrupted and the power-greedy ruling would like to prevent their power in any means. Still, if we could engage international powers as well as like-minded executive powers those who will support the change, this changing will be easier.
This idea already exists but we need to polish it with the help of our digital technology. Grossly it is actually "Non-violent Non-co-operation". When we like to change a corrupted ruling, we need to influence and aware all citizens through a public digital platform or website might be called as "Big No" as well with other various means like discussions, meetings, etc, but all in a secure way. Here everybody will cast their opinion in changing an existing ruling. Our above-cited machines and technology will be used for public anoynimity which never could be known to anyone including the admins of that site even after the change of ruling as well those techs will be used to prevent any kind of tempering and hacking. When all or the majority of the professionals, workers, labors, students, businessman, etc sector will come under a consensus, a sudden and silent non-co-operation will start. If the website's data is true i.e., if it seems that a majority (at least 80% of country's adult population)wants the change, a sudden physical impact of non-co-operation will appear like a bolt from the blue regarding a call from the website. Every sector in a state will declare non-co-operation with the ruling corrupted government. When the majority will be in a strike or in non-co-operation mode, the existing ruling could not run with the help of some minor supporters as well the JUDICIARY AND EXECUTIVE GOVERNMENT then seeing this non-co-operation will declare the change of ruling and our next scholar leaders will take the charge. No such road processions during non-co-operation will be held because they could be targetted. Every government of any time will know that there is such a public system that could give a "Big No" against their ruling so hopefully, they will try to avoid any type of misruling! We might name this as "Barometer of power" and which even will be shown with digital billboards at numerous public places across the whole country. People will see the barometers of the popularity of the government in various issues along with the "Big No" barometer scale.
 |
| Barometers to judge the popularity of government for various issues. |
 |
| "Big No" Barometer |
Every citizen of the country can see, observe, analyze and take their decision and could put their opinions on the "Big No" website through their personal digital devices. As said before, anoynimity and blockchain encryption of the opinions should be maintained. These statistics also will be available in the "Big No" website. Anyway, it's not an easy task but if some scholar and honest people could form a group then with the support of like-minded supporters and their donations, this task could be easier. These scholar and honest people should be suggested by the local communities while analyzing their past activities. If needed a rigorous database of their past and witnesses of people should be build up. With the help of these, local communities will select the right persons to form the kick-starter group to start the revolution. They will plan to collect more and more supporters to change the system. With the help of donated money, they should run the website as well will buy the above-cited machines and software systems to strengthen the whole work or scholars among supporters in respective fields will invent indigenous ways of such systems. More thoughts, research and works needed though on this mechanism.
I know that every system has its pros and cons. This "No Political Election" system also could have drawbacks but we need to define them and need to research more to know if this could eradicate people’s political pains!
Z-ion
Ed: Friday, April 5-14, 2019.
Appendix
|*|Victim
It is historical that, general innocent people often was the victim of the political clashes, they lost their lives in such hazards. This has been increased nowadays. In many countries, innocent people are losing their lives whereas they are not directly involved. I hate this deeply and I know you do also. Is there any ideology or religion that said to kill weaponless innocent people? Does this type of crime satisfy war rules means how could you attack others if they are not your equal opponent in every means? How you could attack a single person with your group that mastans or hooligans often do it( as like "Gender Equality" picture above)? Does not it prove that those who are killing weaponless innocent general people or attacking a single person with a group are cowards? Whatever their ideologies are, they should not harm the lives of innocent people who are not their direct or personal enemy. If they have guts or spine, they should declare war against their equal and right opponent. So we have to raise our voice against this cowardness. We need to educate our people about these. Any government of any state should take projects in hand to educate their people with these ethics and only thus we could eradicate our blacks and could be able to prevent the recurrences like-
Genocides of world wars or of countries.National and international Terrorism, Homicide, Massacar etc.
Religious war and riots.
Political warfare and conflicts.
* Your Money-Yes, it is your/our money that often picked pocket...do we ever checked out our accounts....how our money is used in various projects, what about the quality of the works, why a worthy amount of people has black or corrupted money while their income does not match about that? So a lot of facts and questions out there. Why should not we ask for a public dashboard for every project that will be visible publicly on the Government website and which will show the cost-benefit analysis as well as quality aspects of the project? Why should not we acclaimed for a third party audit both for accounts and the quality? As a general people, you could not analyze those but there are various private and voluntary organizations which could make out the deals if the information about any project is public as said. Remember, these corruptions directly affect what you could own but you cannot own.
From the past to date, you could not be able to count the numerous events of corruption that are published in the newspapers. But here are some recent snaps, those are in question or proved-
Political and Administrative Corruption
- https://www.dhakatribune.com/articles/corruption/
Corruption in Bangladesh
- Bangladesh Corruption Report
Law enforcement agencies most corrupt
No comments:
Post a Comment